I also got
BANNED by Free Republic after ONE post, challenging the War on
Terrorism with facts.
I can say I voted for Clinton and Gore,
and organized for Kucinich and Kerry, but now I know some real reasons
why REAL Republicans probably voted for Bush.
1. Waco -- approximately a dozen people incinerated on US soil
2. Ruby
Ridge -- a teenage boy, family dog, and mother holding an infant all
shot to death, the mother right thru the forehead.
3.
Unconstitutional bombing of Bosnia, undeclared, run by NATO, to
dismember Yugoslavia for Neo-Liberal Wall Street capitalism and looting
... based on hype and feel-good lies
4. A
flurry of unconstitutional executive orders, including the pre-cursor
to the PATRIOT Act.
Mount Carmel was
a religious commune, weird perhaps, but any religion can be considered
weird. David Koresh, he may have been a (non-convicted) pedophile for
sleeping with teenage girls, but that was no reason to incinerate
people and their children. There were many opportunities to arrest
suspects, to serve a warrant, etc. FBI leader even offered to
intervene, as well as other Seventh-Day Adventists, but none were
allowed. FBI and BATF had their plan, and it included a test of
overwhelming military force and shoot to kill orders.
Some of them are still in prison.
Compare to Katrina.
Ruby Ridge involved a
white separatist in Montana. So he wanted to live separately
from blacks. I guess his opinion was to have a white
nation and black nation, but he has said he did not *hate* blacks,
it was just his political opinion. FBI sawed off a shotgun 1/4" too
short and handed it to Randy Weaver. Then he had his fingerprints on
it, so they tried to extort him to be an informant. He refused to be a
rat, refused to surrender to a bogus arrest warrant, and paid the price
with his family's lives.
Clinton's war in Bosnia
involved siding with the Bosnian Muslims, not just any Muslims, but
Al-Qaeda types. Clinton admin recruited help from actual Al-Qaeda
leaders. A Republican Party Committee report --- which was submerged in
favor of Monica --- went into great detail. Leftist site
globalresearch.ca has an article called "Osamagate".
Historically, Serbs were slaughtered
in great numbers in the past by Muslims from Turkey --- btw, I'm a
Jewish pro-Palestinian activist -- and finally fought them off at great
bravery against overwhelming odds. Needless to say they grew alarmed at
the violent insurrection being mounted by the Bosnian sect. The KLA was
listed by our State Dept as heroin-running terrorists.
It's disputed by a friend, but articles indicate that the forces which
were backed in Albania (i think) were Ustashi Fascists, who even
horrified the Nazis by their brutality. After the NATO action, they
came to power and out came the old rhetoric and Nazi symbology.
Since most Muslims, Albanians, Christians, Serbs, etc. got along fine
and intermarried in most areas, it is alleged that the sudden
appearance of ethnic violence was launched by CIA puppets and paid
assets, which was then hyped and exploited in the media to "sell" the
72 days of bombing as a "peace-keeping mission".
The terms of the Peace Accord before the bombing included complete and
total subservience to NATO/US military rule, including slating the
costs of occupation to be borne by Serbians.
No wonder Milosevec died. He was going to testify.
At the time, Sean Hannity blamed Clinton for this war in words he won't
say about Bush.
So did Phyllis Schafly. So did Ramsey Clark.
Other conservatives DO speak out, like Alex Jones who considers
the Fox-bots literal demons. (Jones feat. Cynthia McKinney AND
Dennis K in two of his docu movies, American Dictators and Matrix of
Evil. See video.google.com )
Most conservatives are mum about the worst Clinton crimes. BTW, I
thought it was just Jerry Falwell, but I saw a photo of the Vince
Foster police report, and the first one said he died in his car.
What Bush is
doing with Executive Orders and "signing statements" like the
one which exempted him from following the anti-torture McCain bill he
signed, Clinton did this before, just slightly less extreme.
Republicans who believe in the Constitution were appalled at this and
other *real* *live* police state apparatus being erected.
Bush-bots won't ack that, preferrring the accusation that he was a wimp
and sex-freak who backed gay rights.
Clinton is A
MEMBER of the Bush crime family syndicate, the 'soft cop'
variety. No time for details, but google Mena, AK and Boys on the
Tracks. Hopsicker has a video called Drug Lords on that.
I suppose
THESE are valid reasons they hated Democrats --- and some have finally
had enough -- but the FAKE CONSERVATIVES rarely bring these up. Maybe
they know that Bush is Clinton on steroids, or they focus on bashing
some of the warm, benign, good-hearted liberal proposals he backed.
In essence, I read that Clinton was hired to push thru the most
destructive NAFTA, and that
was the main thing that mattered. It makes serfs out of Americans and
Mexicans alike, and opens US cities and states to lawsuits for damages
from "projected sales lost", when local laws are democratically passed
which in any way restrict corporate rule or malfeasance. Thus every
country in the world which exercises democratic rule, but which still
wants to trade, may be subject to paying huge fines and compensation
from the public sector (TAXES) to corporations --- BUT ONLY TO FOREIGN
CORPORATIONS, domestic corporations don't benefit, unless they sue
another country.
THIS IS THE CLINTON LEGACY. Notice, Kerry supported that too. Bush is
pushing CAFTA and FTAA, which are intended to gradually make "borders"
meaningless, and created a North-Central-South American SuperState like
the EU. (You might be shocked at some video of vegan anti-FTAA
protestors vs. the riot squad robocop who were shooting at them.) Fine
and dandy, but it won't be run by the US Constitution anymore, so
that's MORE police state, more erosion of rights and enviro, MORE
POVERTY, world run by corporations and their Boards, some of whom are
ruthless and inhuman.
I'm afraid.
So YOU removed Msg
290? On a thread castigating Michelle Malkin (for posting the names and numbers of Liberals on her
website, leading to actual death threats) and
people talking about HATING ALL Republicans. Something I said was
inflammatory? Rule-breaking?
It
should be clear, having voted for both Clinton and Kerry and campaigned
for Kerry and Kucinich, I've never been a Republican.
I'm not trying to FREEP your board. Why the censorship? I'm
talking about evidence and history.
Is
anything negative to the DLC immediately removed here? If so,
this is no better than Free Republic, who banned me
for writing about 9-11 and govt complicity of key security officials
HELPING the terrorists.
====================
====================