So the govt finally released photos proving the "no planes theory" is a hoax.
That was debunked as early as FOUR years ago (2002). Serious engineers and video people who spent a lot of time investigating, and did prove that 9-11 was an inside job beyond any reasonable doubt, etc, all of them completely and thoroughly debunked the "Hunt the Boeing" a.k.a. "No Planes Hit the Pentagon" theory, the "Pods on the planes" theory, and all other related crap as a TOTAL HOAX.
These critics challenged it respectfully at first, used utmost detail, giving these folks the benefit of the doubt in terms of sincerity, but when they got nowhere arguing with the promoters of this crap, some went so far as to state that if Von Kleist is NOT a paid CIA agent, he should be because he's doing their work for free in creating a smokescreen.
Top Legitimate key issues covered up by "no planes" and other manufactured controversies:
LINK back to more complete DISINFO overview.
ALL THE CURRENT "NO PLANE" CONSPIRACY THEORY vs. PENTAGON DEBUNKING PHOTOS -- which I think neither side has 100% "proved" anything and they want it that way -- is ALL MEANT TO BE OBFUSCATION. It's a parallel to all that obsession with Oswald's rifle and the "Magic Bullet Theory", even rifle testing they recently did in Dallas, offset by Oswald's reported lack of shooting skill (couldn't hit a rabbit in Moscow), yada yada yada.
On the other hand, smack inside the Warren Report was an official memo about a $435 loan Oswald got from the US Embassy (CIA) in Russia to fly back. Lone Nut? Commie spy? I don't think so!!!!!!! Plus all the known CIA connections he had in Louisiana and Dallas. The fact that the Fairplay for Cuba office was inside the office of Banister, a right wing Birch Society cop, how cute. How much the Joint Chiefs and CIA hated JFK for blocking their plans, the leadership he fired or demoted, and all the Cuba-phobes who thought he was soft and too prissy. And how the media never discussed this. Did Oswald or Castro control the media too? Osama? But let's debate the stupid rifle for 40 years instead! Get it??
NOTE: Some think all this "popular" 9-11 crap is Liberal anti-Bush stuff. Theirry Meyssan is a French Leftist. Dave Von Kleist is deep in the Christian Right, and while he's not insane about that, lots of his guests are what I would consider really whacko Christian Right people. Then "Loose Change" with it's hip techno, is the same stuff marketed as light Lefty in tone.
However there is some evidence that the producer Dylan Avery is either a Arab-hating Jew on Little Green Footballs, or LGF has exposed him as a "spy" who is really a Jew-hater and. Paul Isaac, Jr, the fireman, is either complaining or suing them, and he posted emails allegedly from Avery with a lot of remarks disparaging to Blacks. Like a bad email hoax, this stuff won't go away
"Hunt the Boeing" and "In Plane Site", issues which have been debunked
This No Planes/Pod theory was so bad, so weak, it was even debunked by other psycho fakes. Most of the debunking is somewhat detailed and technical, but it proved:
a) plane parts ARE visible at the Pentagon, and are actually visible in photos inside the "Hunt the Boeing" book
b) the damage to the Pentagon IS consistent with a 767 hitting the façade (at least partly, I question whether a plane alone could have busted clean through three layers or steel-reinforced concrete)
c) bodies WERE found there, and identified, by reputable people who were not merely shills for the govt
d) dozens of people, from right there and nearby, DID see a plane fly into the Pentagon, only a few people described a missile, and even their quotes were cut off to make it seem like they were saying something different
e) the "Pod theory" was debunked as a trick of light shining off a wing faring
Yet the theory had legs, partly because it's so simple and visual, and it appeals to simple-minds. Partly by promotion, which takes money. (No insult intended, I bought the video and accepted part of it, and but rejected the "Pods" part even at first glance, the Pod thing was too fuzzy to tell anything one way or another.)
(von Kleist says "I'm only asking questions" but he's a liar, because he clearly said "there's no plane there".)
'The 9/11 Minority Report'
Why the 9/11 Movement was created
by, and is fostered by the very people
who carried out the attacks...
Not surprisingly, this DEBUNKED HOAX got the most traction online, and the most traction in MSM, appearing on TV even on Fox. That's a clue. Like a bad email hoax, it won't go away.
When "Boeing" and "IPS" first came out, some pooh-poohed it and said to ignore it, but others said this needed to be debunked, because it would someday be used to smear ALL legitimate 9-11 findings.
Some even mentioned suspicions that the govt was withholding the Pentagon video for this very reason --- to fan the flames of controversy around the Pentagon meme, to set up a strawman they could later knock down.
They also predicted that Rumfeld's intentional "Freudian slip" about a "missile" (which "validated" In Plane Site) would later be used to make everyone look stupid. It was. After the controversy churned a while, Rummy blew it off as a slip of the tongue. Missile? Plane? Anyone could make a slip like that. "Missile" can mean a pencil thrown at someone.
Sure enough, Ben Chertoff, brother(?) of the director of Homeland Security wrote a long article debunking ALL "9-11 conspiracy theories" (except the govt's) by focusing on all the In Plane Site stuff, and by misquoting some other stuff. It was a total hit piece. This had to be pre-arranged.
DEEP VIEW OF HISTORY
InsideTrackNews051020_Shock_Awe_Rise_Mil_Ind_Complex.mp3 - Shock and Awe, Rise of the Military Industrial Complex
History of the Shock and Awe going back to 1945
PSYOPS - Manipulating the Mind for Tyranny - How Hitler did it, how the Germans got sucked in.