|
So the govt
finally released photos proving the "no planes
theory" is a hoax.
Big Deal!! That was debunked
as early as FOUR
years ago (2002). Serious engineers and video
people who spent a lot of time
investigating, and
did prove that
9-11 was an inside job
beyond any
reasonable doubt,
etc, all of them completely and thoroughly
debunked the "Hunt the Boeing" a.k.a. "No
Planes Hit the Pentagon" theory,
the "Pods
on the planes"
theory, and all other related crap as a TOTAL
HOAX.
These critics challenged it respectfully at first, used utmost detail, giving these folks the benefit of the doubt in terms of sincerity, but when they got nowhere arguing with the promoters of this crap, some went so far as to state that if Von Kleist is NOT a paid CIA agent, he should be because he's doing their work for free in creating a smokescreen. LINK back to
more complete DISINFO
overview.
ALL THE CURRENT
"NO PLANE" CONSPIRACY THEORY vs. PENTAGON DEBUNKING PHOTOS -- which I
think neither side has 100% "proved" anything and they want it that
way -- is ALL MEANT TO BE
OBFUSCATION.
It's a parallel to all that obsession
with Oswald's rifle
and the "Magic Bullet
Theory", even rifle testing they recently did in Dallas, offset by
Oswald's reported lack of shooting skill (couldn't
hit a rabbit in Moscow), yada yada yada.
On the other hand,
smack inside the Warren Report was an official
memo about a $435 loan
Oswald got from the US Embassy
(CIA) in Russia to fly back. Lone
Nut? Commie spy? I don't
think so!!!!!!! Plus all the known CIA connections he had in Louisiana
and Dallas. The fact that the Fairplay for Cuba office was inside
the office of Banister, a right wing Birch Society cop, how cute.
How much the Joint Chiefs and CIA hated JFK for
blocking their plans, the leadership he fired or demoted, and all the
Cuba-phobes who
thought he was soft and too prissy. And how the media
never discussed this. Did Oswald
or Castro control the media too? Osama? But let's debate the
stupid rifle for 40 years instead! Get it??
NOTE:
Some think all this "popular" 9-11 crap is Liberal
anti-Bush stuff. Theirry Meyssan is a French Leftist.
Dave Von Kleist is deep in the Christian Right,
and while he's not insane about that, lots
of his guests are what I would consider really
whacko Christian Right people. Then "Loose Change" with it's hip
techno, is the same stuff marketed as light Lefty in tone.
However
there is some evidence that the producer Dylan Avery is either a
Arab-hating Jew on Little Green Footballs, or LGF has exposed
him as a "spy" who is really a Jew-hater and. Paul
Isaac, Jr, the fireman, is either complaining or suing them, and he
posted emails allegedly from Avery with a lot of remarks disparaging to
Blacks. Like a bad email hoax, this stuff won't go away
"Hunt the Boeing" and "In Plane Site", issues which have been debunked This No
Planes/Pod theory
was so bad, so weak, it was even debunked by other psycho fakes.
Most of the debunking is somewhat detailed and technical, but it
proved:
a) plane
parts ARE
visible at the Pentagon, and are actually visible in photos inside the
"Hunt the Boeing" book
b)
the damage to
the Pentagon IS consistent with a 767 hitting the façade (at
least partly, I question whether a plane alone could have busted clean
through three layers or steel-reinforced concrete)
c) bodies
WERE found
there, and identified, by reputable people who were not merely shills
for the govt
d)
dozens of
people, from right there and nearby, DID see a plane fly into the
Pentagon, only a few people described a missile, and even their
quotes were cut off to make it seem like they were saying something
different
e) the
"Pod theory" was
debunked as a trick of light shining off a wing faring
Yet the theory had legs, partly because
it's so simple and visual, and it appeals to simple-minds. Partly by promotion,
which takes money. (No insult intended, I bought the video and accepted part
of it, and but rejected the "Pods" part even at first
glance, the Pod thing was too fuzzy to tell anything one way or
another.)
(von Kleist says "I'm only asking questions" but he's a liar, because he clearly said "there's no plane there".) Why
the 9/11 Movement was created
by, and is fostered by the very people who carried out the attacks... Not surprisingly, this DEBUNKED HOAX got
the most traction online, and the most
traction in MSM, appearing on TV even on Fox. That's a clue. Like a bad email hoax, it won't go away.
When "Boeing" and
"IPS" first
came out, some pooh-poohed it
and said to ignore it,
but others said this needed
to be debunked, because it would someday be used to smear ALL
legitimate 9-11 findings.
Some even mentioned suspicions that the govt was withholding the Pentagon video for this very reason --- to fan the flames of controversy around the Pentagon meme, to set up a strawman they could later knock down. They also predicted that Rumfeld's intentional "Freudian slip" about a "missile" (which "validated" In Plane Site) would later be used to make everyone look stupid. It was. After the controversy churned a while, Rummy blew it off as a slip of the tongue. Missile? Plane? Anyone could make a slip like that. "Missile" can mean a pencil thrown at someone. Sure enough, Ben Chertoff, brother(?) of the director of
Homeland Security wrote a long article debunking ALL "9-11 conspiracy
theories" (except the govt's) by focusing on all the In Plane Site
stuff, and by misquoting
some other stuff. It was a total hit piece. This had
to be pre-arranged.
DEEP VIEW OF HISTORY
InsideTrackNews051020_Shock_Awe_Rise_Mil_Ind_Complex.mp3 - Shock and Awe, Rise of the Military
Industrial Complex
History of the Shock and Awe going back to 1945 http://www.Takeoverworld.info/mp3/bfn/InsideTrackNews051020_Shock_Awe_Rise_Mil_Ind_Complex.mp3
PSYOPS - Manipulating the Mind for Tyranny - How Hitler did it, how the Germans got sucked in. |
