Bush-Nazi connection Bush's actual Nazi background is LESS important than the political dynasty of totalitarian rule which is behind BOTH parties.  Bill and Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, George Herbert Walker Bush, and George W. Bush are all joined at the hip, throughout 50-100 years of history, and a web of political, financial, corporate, industrial connections to a most VILE bunch of elitists who are only distinguished from the Nazis by their subtlety. Americans invented Eugenics ("science" of race and breeding), the Holocaust, Propaganda, and Fascistic ideology.

Home (start) Page 1 Home Page 1-A (extension) Home Page 1-B (extension) INDEX2 9-11 & Fourth Reich, Nazi history INDEX3 blackbox voting, peak oil, other issues AudioLinks - poli - (Jones and Parenti) Amazing 9-11 audio-vid Site Map Video-Aud List Fascist Nazi History a website dedicated to the convergence of real conservative and real Leftist thought and action

More on  NAZI HISTORY

a good video about Nazi symbolism and US involvement with the Third Reich.  It's simple but covers part of the story.
the next part, a good Bush-Nazi video explaining ties btw the Bush family and the Third Reich.

Here's one of many articles linking the Bush family to the Holocaust.  Newspapers refuse to print them.  (PDF Acrobat file)   Here's a bunch of photoscanned original documents on the Bush-Nazi connection.   Most people who call Bush a Nazi imply that he's LIKE a Nazi, in other words, is invoking fascist or authoritarian policies, like supreme commander over everything and above the law. Even Republicans who voted for Bush, God Bless their hearts, are finally accusing him of fascism.  What the heck is Unitary Executive Theory?  Bush says it means, 'As long as we are "at war" I get to make all the rules with no interference.  I can even pass a law and write myself an exception.  Limits under the Constitution?  They no longer apply.  We are at war --- until I say we're not.'

Sociopathy -- An Infectous Mental Disease often passed down in wealthy families. SOCIOPATHY The DSM-IV-TR, a widely used manual for diagnosing mental disorders, defines anti-social personality disorder as a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since age 15 years, as indicated by three (or more) of the following: failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure impulsivity or failure to plan ahead aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults reckless disregard for safety of self or others consistent irresponsibility lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another Adolph Hitler is probably the most studied madman in global history. A sociopath need not have all the traits: three is sufficient, If John D. Rockefeller, Sr., had his own beliefs applied to himself he would have been tortured, and then gased like an unloved stray dog in a pound. That's what nazis did to millions of others when they applied the theories funded by Rockefeller money. John D. believed in elimination of the 'unfit'. He believed in building a better human race by extermination of the bottom tenth, the least worthy. Rockefeller believed in Eugenics. John D. Rockefeller was not alone of the moguls of Wall Street to believe in, fund, plan for, and carry out plans for wholesale populations disposals -- he was joined by his brother William and nephew Percy, his son John D. Rockefeller, Jr., Andrew Carnegie, E.H. Harriman's widow and offspring E. Roland Harriman and W. Averell Harriman, Henry Ford, "Corn Flakes" inventor Kellogg, and many other famous names. Unfamous at the time, Samuel Prescott Bush, and George Herbert Walker (both grandfathers to G.H.W. Bush and great-grandfather to George "Dubya" Bush) taught these eugenics values to their families, as history has shown.

The Bush family and the S&L Scandal

By the way, Tony Blair and Vlad Putin and John Howard are doing the same things, seizing power for the Executive Branch and putting themselves beyond appeal.

 Only one particular set of Nazis in a particular time advocated for the Aryan race and promoted genocide (or eugenics). 

The Nazis actually learned Eugenics stuff from America, but Himmler added the mysticism to it, the Super Powers they thought would come from blood purification back to a mystical Aryan bloodline. 

Goebbels learned how to do propaganda from the US, from Woodrow Wilson, how to create crowd hysteria.

There is a whole history of American Establishment Support for the Nazis on Wall Street and in the mainstream media like Hearst.  IBM, Ford, GM, GE, US Steel, Standard Oil, DuPont, ALCOA, etc.  And the big bankers and investors. I.G. Farben had corporate partnerships with American elites, trading stock and sharing Directors on their boards.  I.G. Farben made the Zyklon gas.

The fact of Bush's blood relation to some Americans who supported the Nazis --- documented by Congress by the conviction of his grandfather via the investigations of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover --- is a minor point compared to the fact that those American-Nazi-Fascist Liaisons and Backers rose to the very height of political power, and established a political+family dynasty straight from the Nazis to the current Bush presidency.

 
Prescott Bush's Nazi history is less important than that of George Herbert Walker. Prescott was a tire salesman who married into the Walker family, and scored a good job as a go-fer.  Granted, he was a go-fer for an international Nazi finance and money-laundering operation, but surely father-in-law Walker was more of a mastermind and insider.

The Bush family's Nazi background is LESS important than the political dynasty of totalitarian rule which is behind BOTH parties.

Some names that form the historical political dynasty:

• Prescott Bush  (after his conviction, he used Nazi money to run for Senate, and he won!) (even though he was guilty of far worse Treason than say John Walker Lindh, he was charged with a far lesser crime and served no time at all, just a loss of some Nazi assets --- that's what it means to be protected)  (Great-Grandpa Herbert "Bert" Walker was also part of this Nazi funding and promotions)
  
• Allen Dulles  (liaison with Nazis for Bush and Harriman*, later CIA founder and Director)
• John Foster Dulles  (his brother, Sec of State, previously law partner with Dulles and Nazi backer)
• John Kennedy (A Cold Warrior who pulled back.  He fired Dulles.  Died mysteriously by a 'magic bullet'. Joe Kennedy had also invested in the Nazis.)
• Lyndon Johnson (worked closely with CIA's goals about invading Nam, lying about Tonkin)
• Richard Nixon (protégé of Bush back in the 40's, and waterboy for Dulles, Nixon protected American Nazis from the McCarthy Committee)
• Gerald Ford (part of the Warren Commission, alongside Dulles who controlled the investigation - Dulles had been fired by JFK prior to the assassination .. figure out that coincidence)
• Jimmy Carter (submitted his resume to the Tri-Lateral Comm, David Rockefeller's org, heir to Standard Oil and Chase Bank [the "Left Nazis"])
• --- Rockefeller was Chairman of the CFR which now has hundreds of members occupying the office of President and cabinet.  The Tri-Lateral Commission is Rockefeller's "sister project" to the CFR.  Co-founder Zbignew  Brzezinski is also the founder of Al-Qaeda.
  
• Ronald Reagan (really Bush, Reagan was a B-actor, Bush was an operator, past head of CIA, you tell me who ran things)
• George Herbert Walker Bush (George's best friend in college, his father was CIA recruiter, who worked for Dulles, who was partner with Bush's daddy)
• Bill Clinton (promoted by Harriman* heirs, whose ancestor Averill had employed Prescott Bush, Clinton remains a close friend of the Bush family back to when he was governor or before, and Clinton was a major player in the crime syndicate around Bush and Ollie North and CIA)
• George "W" Bush  (with a Cabinet that is partly a duplicate of his fathers' cabinet, and some from Nixon's)
• Hillary Clinton (Dragon-lady, tied by marriage to the CFR and her husband's Nazi friends, W is "telegraphing" her win)

 

Who's up next?  Jeb?  Neil?  Jenna?  Chelsea?  I'm sure the NWO has a couple scenarios figured out.

Most people probably think Bush is a Conservative, because of the marketing. Max Boot, pundit, says that Bush and his neo-conservative buddies are like Hard Wilsonian Progressive Democrats. Republicans in the past opposed that warmongering government-in-your-closet crap!  They are starting to oppose it again.  Hope it's not too late.

Some wise people have said that Bush is less "like Hitler" than the American people are "like Germans in 1933", ripe for totalitarian rule, eager to have a strong charismatic leader run things. Most of the Founding Fathers wanted the President to be more like a ceremonial figurehead, with less power than Congress, less like an autocratic King. We're moving in the opposite direction without a doubt. And most Americans are cheering it on ... or were. (Some Conservatives are actually leading the resistance from within.)

The War on Terrorism is the basis of all the new totalitarianism, just like the Reichstag and other manufactured threats was the basis for Hitler's expansion of power.

Don't forget about the War on Drugs. Both were a war on Americans. Neither war solved the "stated" problem. Both wars made vast progress on the "actual" problem, which is the idea that Americans have too much Constitutional Liberty.

Instead, the CIA finally admitted shipping cocaine and heroin. Heroin shipments from Afghanistan have skyrocketed since the Taliban fell. The head of our SEC was photographed lobbying the FARC guerillas about investing their profits in Wall Street. We also know the CIA has funded and trained Al-Qaeda for decades since 1978. Oh, but that was an accident. There's a parallel here children, connect the dots.

This is not about Bush, per se. Clinton made strong strides towards Federal Totalitarianism.  Sorry children, I wish I could say "vote Democrat and your problems will be over".

Differences between Germany and America arise because Americans have a strong background of democratic representation in a Republican form of govt. Too much overt change too quickly rings alarm bells. It has to be massaged in, slowly, with elaborate and marginally believable justification. Four steps forward, two steps back.  What am I saying?  Hitler used elaborate and marginally believable justifications.

And there is NO NEED to vest power in one single leader or one party. That's a red flag. Much better, create two "opposite" parties which bicker about minor differences but converge on major policies. Make sure that the parties are controlled by the same group of 1% of Americans who funds their elections, who control the financial levers of power.

Minimize all dissenting voices besides theirs. Either block free dissent or channel it into those parties. Take a step at a time, get Americans used to totalitarianism by inches and feet, not yards. A few decades is no big deal. Even a few generations -- starting from the early 1900's that is.

"Foreign-sponsored Terrorism" is one trigger for lockdowns.  But don't patrol borders, start domestic surveillance instead. To solve immigration problems, eliminate borders. Yeah, that's the ticket. Eliminate national borders and lock down cities. Electronic surveillance is more discreet than troops on street corners.

"Right wing Terrorism" is another trigger. What about Waco? Incinerating American men, women, and children in their homes. Let all them Patriots know what can happen to them. Shoot a mother in the head in her doorway at Ruby Ridge, then exonerate the shooters. Start busting down doors of suspected drug dealers, without a warrant. If some elderly die, oh well.

Start seizing people's homes on government edict, like in Connecticut.  Sell public highways in Texas to a foreign corporation in Spain, institute a system of surveillance ticketing. Sell public ports to the British protectorate of Dubai, to a private shell company controlled by someone with an American name. Make people think the controversy only about "Arabs", not selling off America. Sell off California ports and the Panama Canal to companies from China.

Send out an $8 million Homeland Security Military Task Force to Florida to shoot and arrest old people, union activists, and young vegan-types. Use War on Terrorism money on Americans instead of Bin Laden. Go after people who are protesting Executive Orders which guts Constitutional authority and the US Rule of Law and transfers it to a Free Trade AREA of the Americas, a regional hemispheric governing body which eventually will encompass all of North and South America, according to stated goals. (FTAA will make everyone *rich* ... just like Clinton's NAFTA did. Hmmm.)

Use Mexican troops to patrol Katrina, and train Russian troops on house-to-house searches in Texas.

Look up NWO quotes. Think neo-conservatives are against the UN? They tell you in their own words about their commitment to global govt, which will be a totalitarian form of socialism. After all, "the Constitution is just a goddamn piece of paper".

Here's a few quotes:

Michael Ledeen's book Universal Fascism rejects the idea of a Fascist regime, like Hitler or Mussolini.  Instead, his vision is a global Fascist govt. "Karl Rove's Brain" wrote book praising Fascism.  Some anti-communist conservatives suggest that's like the 4th Internationale, minus any real semblance of worker's control.

Probably use as many "liberal" measures to enact totalitarianism --- like outlawing guns --- as conservative measures --- like making women's uterine tracts the property of the State.  Always make it look like the problem is just "the other party".

That's some the cosmetic differences.

For reference, look up a speech by Republican Ron Paul, called Neoconned. Look up what long time Republican Bob Barr (who prosecuted Clinton) said. Look up what Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Treasurer who was the father of Reagonomics said. ALL said "we are moving into a totalitarian state".

Right now, it's flavored like right wing "Nationalistic" totalitarianism. Next, it will be flavored like left wing "Communist" totalitarianism.

The CIA is representative of the financial elites of the Brzezinski-Rockefeller-Kissinger-Wilson-Plame-Eagleburger Tri-Lateral Commission cabal. The "bad evil Neocons" are the latest whipping boy but they are cut from the same cloth. Brzezinski created Al-Qaeda by the way.

The Tri-Lateral supported both Carter and Clinton. Some members seemed to have a genuine distaste for the overt militarism of Bush, preferring a more covert form of global domination. They were worried about Bush breaking their stranglehold on the Middle East.

However, the CFR which is the younger sister of the TLC is also full of Neo-cons from the Project for A New American Century.

That's why I stated, Bush's actual Nazi background is LESS important than the political dynasty of totalitarian rule which is behind BOTH parties. A financial-political stranglehold where the US economy is controlled at a Federal Level to benefit the largest corporations, and where that control is ultimately moved offshore to other central governing bodies that have the power to trump Congress --- that works much better than a bunch of goose-stepping Nazis.

However, rest assured the CIA, FBI, BATF, NSA, Northcom, and militarized local police answering to federal authorities are already moving into a gradual seizure of powers which mimic the power of the Nazi SS. Dissent will probably be less criminalized than the Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, but it will be rendered more irrelevant.